INDIA IS HINDU
by
Radha Rajan
Gandhi refused to let Hindus pick up arms against the Muslim League and aggressively oppose its stated objective to vivisect the Hindu nation.
When the white christian european colonisers had to retreat from Asia and this happened around the same time that Japan's Emperor Hirohito announced Japan's surrender in August 1945, then the white Christian colonisers which included Lord Mountbatten in British Malaya, handed the Asian countries back to the white Christian european tormentors - Korea to France, Vietnam was divided in equal halves and shared by America and Soviet Union, Indonesia was handed back to Portugal and the Netherlands while Britain took away the hump from Borneo and left the remains called Kalimantan with the Indonesians.
In Korea, the buddhist country was handed on a platter to a renegade Syngman Rhee whose only virtue was that he lived in exile in the US and was a Christian. The nationalist Lyuh who was also born in a Christian family but who later became a communist was assassinated to make things simpler for the Korean Christian to take full charge.
In Vietnam too the Catholic church played its dirtiest game yet when it divided the country and thrust 3 vietnamese Christians to successively rule the Buddhist country until the military ended the Christian rule, unified the country and sent the church packing.
The colonisers always looked for Christian convert puppets in Asia to thrust upon non-Christian Asian countries as their political leaders. In India things did not quite go the way the British wanted when it created the INC (Indian National Congress) to wean away powerful Hindus from ideas of independence and to subvert any fledgling idea of Hindu state power.
That is why they brutally neutralised Aurobindo, Savarkar and Tilak and planted Gandhi inside the Congress (INC) only because Gandhi did not want freedom, was virulently against Aurobindo and Savarkar, even dared to diminish Tilak. Gandhi unfortunately for the British was not Christian and he had not married a Christian but he was the next best thing to a Christian- he was inspired by Jesus Christ and Gandhi spoke of Jesus Christ in the same breath as Sri Rama.
More importantly Gandhi had only contempt for those like savarkar, Dhingra, Aurobindo and Bhagat Singh who advocated armed freedom struggle against the British.
Gandhi's lasting legacy is the deliberate, systematic unmanning of the Hindus, killing the spirit of the Kshatriya in Hindus. It was Gandhi who marginalised Tilak, Gandhi who never spoke a word about Aurobindo as being a Hindu leader, who refused to intercede with the British to commute the death sentence on Bhagat Singh, who manouevered Subhash Bose out of the INC.
Gandhi faithfully kept the INC a vehicle to fulfill the British agenda to wean away Hindus from armed struggle, to facilitate vivisection and facilitated Hindus to be weakened in body and mind vis a vis the Muslim league and jihad.
Gandhi in India was like Syngman Rhee in Korea, like Ngo Dinh Diem in Vietnam while Aurobindo, Savarkar and Tilak were to India what Ho chi Minh was to Vietnam and Lyuh Woon Hyung was to Korea.
Gandhi refused to allow Hindus to pick up arms against the muslim league and made sure Hindus were not organized or mobilised as Hindus and that is why this bhumi was vivisected; and that is why jihad will always succeed against Hindus and that is why Rajiv Gandhi's meeting with the Christian Sonia Gandhi was facilitated.
It was time for the INC to once again be led by a Christian with a Christian agenda for the Hindu Nation. Indira Gandhi was a dangeorus aberration and Narasimha Rao was beginning to go the Indira Gandhi way. The time had to come to return the INC back to its raison d'etre - to make Hindu India a vassal state of generic Church.
It was Hindus in the INC who betrayed the Hindu nation in Gandhi's time; it is the Hindus in the INC like P Chidambaram, Digvijay Singh, Sushil Kumar Shinde who are now betraying the Hindu nation again.
They are labeling Kshatriyas who picked up arms against jihad and jihadis as Hindu terrorists. Muslims and Christians have no claim to the territory of this land, India that is Bharat. They can live here with full constitutional guarantees (that is always the Hindu way) but they have no claim on the territory as owners of this country. It is to make sure that Hindus do not pick up arms to defend their bhumi that the renegade Hindus in the INC and its allies - have coined the word Hindu terror, and have concocted the strawman of Hindu terrorism from thin air.
When and if Hindus pick up arms against jihad and religious conversion - both aimed at eating away Hindu territory, they are not "terrorists." They are Kshatriyas. No Hindu terrorists on Hindu Bhumi. If the Congress and its stooges do not want Hindus to pick up arms then let them begin to protect this territory from the Abrahamic intent to Christianise and Islamise India or at the very least not bring Hindu India under a Chriatian or Muslim heel. Hindus in india should not permit a Bao Dai (married to a Christian too), a Syngman Rhee or a Diem to rule India.
India is Hindu. RR
No comments:
Post a Comment